Jul 15, 2009

On Outrage

Tim Kreider has a great column on nytimes.com about the good and bad that comes with cartooning while outraged. Kreider is the creator of the weekly strip "The Pain, When Will It End?" which he stopped drawing this year.

Outrage is like a lot of other things that feel good but over time devour us from the inside out. And it’s even more insidious than most vices because we don’t even consciously acknowledge that it’s a pleasure. We prefer think of it as a disagreeable but fundamentally healthy involuntary reaction to negative stimuli thrust upon us by the world we live in, like pain or nausea, rather than admit that it’s a shameful kick we eagerly indulge again and again.

Outrage can make for great cartoons. When you look back on them years later, as Kreider notes, they can appear shrill. You've calmed down since then. The immediacy wears off over time. But this medium is about timeliness and the times often call for outrage.

I'm always negotiating the balance between proper anger and humor in my work. Everyone has their own happy spot and I'm usually satisfied with the result (while simultaneously being unsatisfied with my work, of course). On one end of the spectrum you have someone like Mr. Fish, who draws uncompromising cartoons that often eschew humor to make political points. The other end is overrun with substanceless, witless gag cartoons. Trying to focus the outrage into solid work doesn't appear to be a concern for as many cartoonists as it should be.

4 Comments:

Blogger moquiti said...

Maturity in cartooning comes from being able to express outrage without being shrill. Look at the greats. Their strong work does not devolve into shrill-ness. Only their weak work does.

One reason Kreider stopped cartooning I suspect is because he lacked empathy for his targets. I think if you have some empathy, you can see into your target's psyche a little, and it not only makes for better work (as it contains some humanity), but it balances the caustic effect of anger & frustration.

6:45 PM  
Anonymous Lamb Cannon said...

Say what you will, I miss Tim Kreider's cartooning (as much as I love yours of course).

The NYT op-ed page already had enough tiresome solipsism, even though Tim's viewpoints are worth reading.

I just feel that good art is a much more subtle communicator. The almost Hirschfeld strength to Tim's lines... or your own unique, um, accent on rondure in the human face? Certainly I understand Tim's frustration with working at the level of the Baltimore giveaway rag, but... why can't the Times hire him to cartoon? God nose they could use it.

8:24 AM  
Blogger Matt Bors said...

Oh, I wish he was still cartooning as well.

The Times could hire three full-time staff cartoonists for less than it costs for Tom Friedman to jet set around the world. Oh, and you would actually get good content.

1:16 PM  
Blogger Aaron Manton said...

Plus if people buy Tom's Tripe(tm), they'd surely buy a book of funny pictures.

4:55 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home